Imagine being blacklisted by camera brands. At f/14 the AF in the R5 is limited to the centre of the frame only and will be noticeably slower than normal. A massive telephoto lens with a fixed aperture the adheres to the Olympus standards of weight, compact size and quality. Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-400mm f/4.5 TC1.25x IS PRO Lens - Adorama Comments on this article may be moderated before they are made public. I am impressed how big this lense is. Have had two people I know waffle between camera brands (FUJI, SONY, OLY). Ergonomics are some of the strongest in the industry. Nikon followed suit and I'm fairly sure a few people used those cameras and their followups for sports and wildlife. The optical design comprises several special glass elements, including four ED elements and two 'HR' high refractive-index elements. He provides oversight to all of the daily tasks, including editorial, administrative, and advertising work. Once again, the whole equivalence deal doesn't create much misconception if it's taken for what it is in its photographic consequences. I know that for sure. Imagine a camera sensor as a shallow Petrie dish. Look, I shoot FF and i also use some of these cameras like the A7RIII or the RIV in crop mode. If both cameras capture the same exposure, an M43 sensor captures 2-stops less light and 2-stops more shot noise than a full-frame sensor. Because, many other technical perfections aside, they use T-Stops, instead of f-stops. F11 is DOF equivalent only, and is not how much light hits the sensor. Those lenses in EF mount can also be used on M43 with full control. Do not worry, you are still cute. @ armandino"Btw when comparing with cameras worth using for birding, like the A9II, R6, R5, D850 you are a full stop or more behind. If you really want to talk about aperture as an absolute, talk about the APERTURE ITSELF. No arguing that one.https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20Z%206II,Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1%20Mark%20IIIConsidering that small birds seem to be the principal subject for such lens, retaining highlight details is key. Olympus 150-400 vs Panasonic 100-400 - Digital Photography Review Who cares about DOF when shooting action with such a telephoto lens? All the advances in sensors & processing will enable crop sensors to be good enough. It may be that m4/3 does disappear, but right now such assertions are no more than fake news. No way I'd take 200-600 hiking, but MkII with 2 lenses - sure thing. If you’re an advanced shooter, I think you’ll get the hang of it. "you can still shoot at 64 iso and pull shadows to retain the highlights. A 200mm f2, 300mm f2, and 400mm f2 lens set would be incredible, and I don’t think they’d need to be so huge because Micro Four Thirds only uses the center of the optics. Car & Truck Safety & Security Accessories, Olympus 40-150mm f/3.5-4.5 Zuiko Digital Zoom Lens for E1, E300...(skr-2711), Lens Cap - Custom Photo Cap for Nikon, Canon, Sony, Sigma Large Telephoto Lenses, Custom Lens Cap for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-400mm f/4.5 TC1.25X IS PRO, Olympus Digital 14-150mm f4-5.6 II M.Zuiko ED MSC Lens Japan 230601, Olympus Digital 40-150mm f3.5-4.5 Zuiko Lens Original 4/3 #G218, Olympus Zuiko Digital AF 40-150mm F3.5-4.5 Lens for Four Thirds DSLR Cameras, Olympus Digital 40-150mm f3.5-4.5 Zuiko Lens Original 4/3, Olympus Digital 40-150mm f4-5.6 M.Zuiko R ED MSC Lens Micro 4/3, Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 100-400mm F/5-6.3 IS Lens + Hood Mint From JP #2906A, [Near Mint] Olympus OM-System Zuiko Auto-Zoom 1:4 f=75-150mm #1914283, Olympus Zuiko 40-150mm f/3.5-4.5 EZ Lens *UNTESTED AS-IS*, Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm f/4-5.6 R ED Lens for m4/3 Mount, Olympus 40-150mm f/3.5-4.5 ED Zuiko Digital Lens Four Thirds mount, Olympus Zuiko 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 ED Lens + hood, Excellent++ Horseman Super ER 150mm f/5.6 Seiko-SLV Large Format Lens from Japan, OLYMPUS M. ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 14-150mm F/4.0-5.6 1:4.0-5.6 II Lens Black, 【MINT in Box】 Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 40-150mm f4-5.6 ED MSC Lens From JAPAN, Olympus Digital 40-150mm f4-5.6 Zuiko ED Lens Original 4/3 #558, Olympus Zuiko Digital 40-150mm f/3.5-4.5 for Four Thirds lens [Exc+++] Y562, EXC++++ OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO AUTO-ZOOM 75-150mm f4 from Japan 148304, Olympus Digital 40-150mm f4-5.6 Zuiko ED Lens Original 4/3 #920. @MEDISNin regard of your last comment I repeat: for what you get out of it, I am pretty sure the A7RIV with a 200-600 will get you there for much less, while owning an outstanding FF 61MP camera instead of a puny 20 MP MFT... Not much of a carrying size and weight argument here.That is also why, Oly MFT is and will remain niche despite your best efforts making a point that is sensical for you. The new FF cameras like the A7RIV or an R5 will give you incredible details at closer range, while retaining a good resolution matching a crop sensor for further away subjects. News, Yahoo! Sourov - you should read on Equivalence before you dismiss what it means.Yes, DOF of m43rds at f4.5 is like F9 in FF (2 stops)Yes, A FF at F9 with a higher ISO (2 stops higher) will match the shutter speed of m43rds at F4.5 with roughly the same quality- assuming sensors of similar tech.It's not that complicated. Let me explain why, it's very simple: - At 1000mm the canon becomes f/14.2 (because of TC2X).- At 1000mm the olympus becomes f/5.6 AKA f/11 full frame equivalent.BIG difference. Personally am all in on Olympus. If price is a issue then the lens is not for you ,really the sensor is not much smaller than aps-c but in a better 4:3 format ,as you know 3:2 ratio loses a lot of image space in general mostly you cut of the ends of the image .Agreed though it is not the lens for the majority and those starting wildlife will not see this as a good option (bargain)to begin with ,it is mainly for existing m43 users ,and probably why you see so many aps-c cameras with superzooms they just are good value for wildlife with few compromises , although there are now a fair few m43 users shooting using a 100-400mm panasonic or olympus.Yes the s/h dslr area is where bargains are to be had . https://photographylife.com/reviews/nikon-180-400mm-f4e-tc1-4-fl-ed-vrMaybe I find it excellent because Nasim's conclusions are much like my opinion, the difference being that I am based just on theory, while he did extensive and trustful tests.I keep my argument, the design should have been refused from scratch. Therefore, making the full frame as an standard, became important. Any news on the Olympus 150-400 lens? - Digital Photography Review You might get more resolution from the Nikon of course but for 2X the price and nearly 2X the weight you ought to get some advantage, that's for sure. Everyone have their vision and way of shooting. It’s arguably one of the most capable lenses on the market today. My take. That doesn't make the lens worse or anything- it is what it is. That's a two-stop difference in both signal and shot noise captured. It’s not awful, but it’s surely noticeable. "The f/4.5 maximum aperture of the Olympus means the image it delivers to an M43 sensor wide open is equivalent in shot noise to that delivered by a lens at f/9 (2-stops less light) on a full-frame body" I would like to see real world test of that. But also in similar Format. People often have their eye on "the next thing" and then are disappointed when they jump and never truly exhaust the features of gear they have. -- hide signature --. @MEDISNSigma produces a 120-300/2.8 for FF at $3,600. :P You simply can't argue with the facts. @Ruairi huge difference in favour of the R5. Even with the “keep warm” function on, they were still a bit warm for my liking. "I am just making a statement that a lens is overpriced. more light hits a full frame sensor surface due to image circle being larger it is why ff in general has a 2 stop advantage ,in exposure,so shooting f11 on ff has no more of a negative impact than shooting 5.6 on m43.Well until you get into diffraction f11 is on the limits on a high res ff sensor. You're right in a way. In the meantime, this 150-400 appears to be a bargain for sports and wildlife with the EM1X. Of course, when you are spending $4,000 on a camera you will get more MP, but we are talking about spending an additional $2,600 for extra MP that are useful in a handful of situations. A9 peaks at 10.59. And I can edit the rest to look better that just blurring with shallow DoF. Olympus and now OM System have always rendered photos a little blue. Those who are coming from, 35mm film camera Format to MFT or APSC, it helps to find the similarity. The Canon RF 100-500 does not have a constant f/4.5 aperture, so that's probably not the best lens to compare it to. @armandino so you need a 35mm sensor buy a lens that suits it. The lens feels great and well-balanced in the hands, on both my E . How often are you shooting a D850 at ISO 64 on birds in flight and how much does THAT lens cost?? Now we do not have anymore to choose between sluggish high resolution FF or high performance low resolution so a high performance crop sensor camera is not as justified as in the past. 0.5 - 0.7 EV difference at the same ISO is minimal and completely acceptable when taking into account that the cameras cost between $1,000 - $1,700 less (EM 1 Marks III, EM1 Mark II) compared to current mid-range full-frame cameras. Preis vom: 02.05.2023, 15:58:42 (Preis kann jetzt höher sein!) It weighs 1060g, so it's about half the weight of the Olympus 150-400. I would love to hear it. In other words, it may be worth it for some folks to buy an Olympus camera just to use with this lens because camera and lens would be cheaper and have different strengths than a 12k super tele from Canon or Nikon (especially if you don't already have a DSLR system). Just how do you guys expect a high MP FF camera to compete with a smaller one? After 1945, it was transferred into the ownership of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia. My impression is Oly users here are really into their religion.... if you are serious for wildlife you want DR and lowlight performance, M4/3 gathers 1/4 light of FF. I have watched a couple of videos of togs using the 150-400 and their results are spectacular - again hand-held. At same F stop and shutter speed it gathers 1/4 of light since you like to be pedantic. The depth of field equivalence is around f9 on a full-frame camera when shooting wide open. And for that you do not need the ultimate gear. Not F.stops. @MEDISN" You seem to know little and have a lot of opinions about a system you've never used"maybe some common sense dictated by lack of personal attachment to the system.Btw you really seem to cherry pick the elements of a conversation that play your game leaving the rest out while also playing a pedantic and condescending game. @ImagesTooyou sound like an infomercial to me....how that translates in this?https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20D850,Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1X,Sony%20ILCE-7RM4, @ImagesToo "You forget quantum efficiency. Where you are wrong is that the R5 has a vastly better AF system than any Olympus, and the sensor is on another planet compared to the EMX etc... Also you don't need to go to 1000mm you can easily crop the 45megapixel sensor and still get stunning results. The only difference is size and weight and that is in favor of Oly. This is a 150-400mm tele-zoom, which covers an equivalent range of 300-800mm in full-frame terms. To me the thought of having a two lens travel kit (12-100 F/4, 150-400 F/4.5) is salivating. I use Olympus EM1.3 + Olympus 300mm F4 because I think that this combination has an excellent price/performance ratio. All I know is that from our keyboards here in the DP review camera forum, I have about as much knowledge on the topic as you or the next guy. The depth of the water represents exposure. Supporter. Then you have 1 inch, Smartphone, Super 16 and so on. Is Olympus / JIP doomed? The 150-400 will be exclusive because of the already small number of users of a shaky camera company, a even far more minuscule fraction will drop 7K on such a niche lens. For exposure f5.6 is always f5.6Tony Northrup continues his disinformation campaign on MFT. As we'd expect from a lens in Olympus's 'PRO' lineup, the 150-400mm is sealed against dust and moisture, and is rated for use in conditions as cold as -10°C (14°F). As always, the m4/3 haters decry the lens; OK we get it, you don't like the system. The A7RIV is also dog slow compared to any Olympus in the E-M1 range. The D850 is ISO invariant, which, btw is a huge advantage. As for cost, I'm posting in favor of crop cameras only and not this particular lens or camera. And it's simply false and misleading. Going with DOF is light power (power used in a Physics sense) equivalence and diffraction equivalence - the lens is equivalent to FF f/9 in all those matters. I am sure there are a few out there for whom this lens fits the bill. At ISO 600 and above the dual gain A9 gets a whopping one stop advantage on a sensor 4X the area lol. So this is the comparison I would choose when comparing lenses. Different tools for different jobs. If these seem "expensive" to you then you're not the target market. It will expose at f5.6, and AF like it is f5.6, you'll get a extra foot or two of DOF. Chill. Hardly anyone sees diffraction in photos what are worth looking at...sure its there and if you know about it, it might keep you up at night but really at the end of the day I'm sure you could stop down to f16 and not notice anything in most situations. @ Magnar W: That is correct. 15 Hi all, I've just heard from Park Cameras that their first batch of 150-400 lenses is ready to ship and that they are waiting on paperwork to get the units through mainland Europe to the UK. lol As soon as you hit ISO 200, the DR is the same. This is why on FF to make it equivalent the ISO has to go up yielding an image quality similar to m43rds at a lower ISO. Chris's editorial work includes not only editing and scheduling articles but also writing them himself. Check price of the Olympus and Canon gear on B&H Photo Video*:- 150-400mm Pro: https://bhpho.to/2ITzado- E-M1X: https://bhpho.to/2HMCpAg- EOS R6: https://bhp. Amazing how that works, isn't it? Olympus 150-400mm f4.5 lens is finally here! AF at 200mm f2.8 on M43 is faster and more accurate at AF than A9 at 400mm f/5.6. Which gives me more DR shooting wildlife?1. Noise is another story. AF area size when it's designed to work like 500mm. Met de Panasonis S1 heb/krijg je de allerbeste resultaten in FF en zelfs ISO 12800 is in de meeste situaties bruikbaar in tegenstelling tot de MFT sensor max tot ISO 800 -1600! Optical construction of this tele-zoom lens is complex, consisting of 28 elements in 18 groups. For all the folks "High" on full frame. Billed for. Bewertung: 4.8 von 5 Sternen. I would never take any of my other systems out in the rain, but regularly used my old 4/3s kit outside no matter what the weather. I’d imagine this lens could do that with its massive zoom range. If you, say, want to take a shot at 500mm or even 200mm though, the setups are no longer comparable. Now, I was strictly was saying that, Background compression of 300mm on FF = 300mm on Apsc = 300mm on MFT. We tested the Olympus 150-400mm f4.5 PRO in a variety of situations, through hikes in various forests, and on the streets of NY’s parks. So yeah, a bargain and I don't have to mess with adding/removing TC's or adapters. Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-400mm f4.5 TC1.25x IS Pro - idealo Ignoring that this lens doesn't give you 1000mm | f/5.6 either, you could get 1000mm f/5.6 with the Sigma 200-500 f/2.8 with a 2x TC or something close if you can score a copy of the Canon 1200mm f/5.6. T-Stops is the actual amount of light. https://raist3d.typepad.com/files/p1014871_c2018_ricardohernandez-machado.jpghttps://raist3d.typepad.com/files/c2020_ricardohernandez-machado_s0060795.jpghttps://raist3d.typepad.com/files/p8020355.jpghttps://raist3d.typepad.com/files/c2020_ricardo_hernandez-machado_p1017677.jpghttps://raist3d.typepad.com/files/c2020_ricardo_hernandez-machado_p1017631.jpghttps://raist3d.typepad.com/files/c2020_ricardohernandez-machadop1017052-5.jpghttps://raist3d.typepad.com/files/s0250784.jpghttps://raist3d.typepad.com/files/_6700445.jpg. They usually don't hang out on places like DPR with the techgeeks and their religious obsession for ff. I think Darren is right and wrong. Oh wait, the LCD isn't enough pixels.... blah blah blah as the camera industry continues to decline. At least for a short while... A tripod is still a good idea for extended shooting, because while undoubtedly smaller and lighter than an equivalent lens for full-frame would be, at 4.1lb (1.9 kg) you will quickly feel the weight of the 150-400mm around your neck – especially if it's mounted on an E-M1X. @Sourov- so in this context, I don't think there's any lies claimed as real at all. Since that is all I have been arguing I guess we are on the same page. Oly makes a lot of sense, if you are on a budget, that is for sure. @Sourov- I am not talking about T-stops, which are specific to each lens. Depth of field? There aren’t many lenses with built-in teleconverters. Canon has R5 which is somewhat interesting but still compromises and no native RF super tele’s like the EF 200-400/4 which I loved on the 1DXII. Add some blur. I am not dinking around with a 400/5.6. Nobody except for tech nerds care about ISO noise and DR. @MEDISNyou might want to read the section on DR:https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympus-om-d-e-m1-mark-iii-review/5, What is a brief review going to tell me that I haven’t experienced in 4 years (250k images) on the EM1’s , Which gives me more DR shooting sports?1. I am not defensive, why would I need to? While it wouldn't be our first choice for true macro photography, this is impressive for a tele-zoom lens, and makes the 150-400mm very versatile when it comes to smaller subjects like butterflies. Where other manufacturers use 25mm worth of diameter minus the barrels and plastics etc = 26 or 27mm. A pity they didn't consult the many DPR Forums experts who would have told them how they could have made this lens 2 stops faster, 2/3 the size and weight for 1/3 the cost. De 'rest" is enkel academisch! OLYMPUS M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 40-150mm F4.0 PRO -New from JP-Fast ship!! Most of the reservations for "M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 150-400mm F4.5 TC1.25x IS PRO" scheduled to be released on January 22 . :-). Crop is currently very useful for sports and wildlife. Obviously Olympus made a huge strategic mistake when designing this lens. @MEDISNown, use, try... whatever dude, constantly clinging on the words. Not going to put any more into the system. How good is the IQ of a shot you couldn't get? @MEDISN""you can still shoot at 64 iso and pull shadows to retain the highlights"You're just trading highlight protection for shadow noise.". Hands on: Olympus 150-400mm F4.5 TC1.25x - Digital Photography Review But that is not how it goes for most of us. This 89mm aperture is similar in telephoto capabilities to other 89mm apertures on other systems and other focal lengths... because aperture is aperture is aperture. The Fujifilm XT3 (or as they call it, the Fujifilm X-T3) is the company’s latest evolution to their SLR style camera body designed to be a workhorse for many photographers. It also has a lock to ensure that the lens doesn’t accidentally go from one setting to the other. Hold on, it only has 1 high speed card slot. . That's why there are lenses like ARRI Alexa costs about 50,000€. Tehnically the lens is still a 300mm. "Cranking up the ISO" is rarely needed for this type of shooting. "both A7RIV and the 200-600 have environmental seals. However, if the M43 shooter will be in good light, or if very slow shutter speeds can be used with this lens on a tripod, or with IS engaged to photograph static subjects, the comparative noise disadvantage of M43 can be worked around. The AF systems are basically on the 2 ends of the market.An the price... You can buy the 200-600mm, the A7R4 and a 70-200mm f2.8 for the price of this Oly lens.Where is that ballpark? Which turns this tread in a pretty useless yet entertaining conversation: watching you bending backwards trying to the deny the simple fact that $7K of this lens is just silly, a 300-800mm F9 equivalent elite lens for a dying breed.I find it interesting how you constantly try to match up the best Oly has to offer vs pretty average FF set up to try proving something. How far do you need to take it? It was the 7D. The D850, yeah, twice the size and weight with half the frame rate. yea, yea I know, you only shoot raw full frame with the best primes & switch brands every 2 years to get the best dynamic range and noise free shadows in your 30 stacked frame HDR images. I can see buying a camera for this lens. Explicitly Just to figure out the FOV first, AND, may be to know the DOP. From this, you can make a decision for yourself. @paulsch, thanks. ;-), Don't get me wrong, as an Olympus user and actual purchaser of their gear, I do wonder a little. This is not correct. @ VytautasSL: Fully agree with the f-number part of your post! The 150-400 zoom will allow the M43 wildlife enthusiast to be in the same ballpark with a much smaller system. "A bit of an oxymoron imo and that is why it is too expensive and probably not the best marketing choice.". Does that make the tools any less successful? I've used the 200-600 and posted my experience. To get this shot, Olympus paired the 150-400 lens with a 1 . Well, I did not and not going to argue over FOV. I think my A9 will be the end of the Sony road for me. As insanely innovative as the Olympus 150-400mm f4.5 PRO is, it’s also a reminder that I wish OM System made faster lenses. Having owned Sony FF and Olympus (and Fuji), the weather sealing, dust busting, and IBIS of the Olympus are superior compared with Sony. jay jay02, that is really nothing to go by. No way ANY available camera (ok, except some to me unknown specialized camera) has three times the resolution of "any m43 camera". The R6 in electronic shutter has same DR as EM1 - no advantage there. Heck, you can replace the sky if you want! I use a Canon 6D, OM-D E-M1 III, Fuji GF-X and a Contax 645 with a Hasselblad digital back and they all serve me well. f9-f11 equivalent FF diffraction is not going to permit 30+mp. Diffraction limit is reached at more like f11. PAST BYLINES: Gear Patrol, PC Mag, Geek.com, Digital Photo Pro, Resource Magazine, Yahoo! As said before, dpr didn't even try with this lens, it's a shame. Shot noise is proportional to the square root of the total signal captured. EM1 @ 200mm f/2.8, 1/1000s, ISO 400. Olympus and Panasonic have optically excellent big fast fixed focus telephoto lenses for the m4/3 mount. The 200-600 is $2K. In low light, the A9 gets put away for the Olympus. The Panasonic 100-400 is surprisingly light as well. The use of crop factor and "equivalence" when comparing formats has become a parody - like people should calculate equivalent values for everything when they make a crop at post processing! Same shutter. IMHO to judge a lens’s performance characteristics the comparison should be about the final image as rendered on screen or in print. Rather Obsessively that It was almost unhealthy. :P. It’s a sponsored video. @LevAizikIt seems that you and I are on the same pages, but do not tell that to MEDISN, he might get upset that a Oly user agrees with a non Oly user. What do you mean with FF f11 equivalent? "Specialists know what this lens and MFT can do for their work"I believe specialists use primarily Nikon and Canon gear, while Sony is picking up steam. Come on now @George1958, why would you expect ANYONE to provide any supporting evidence for their comments? You've never even used it, lets be real. I mean it is f/5.6 at 200mm, that's the same light gathering as the tiny 40-150/2.8 on Olympus. I see this trend continuing. There's nothing particular complicated about it in terms of the bottomline of what it means for the photography one is doing. and we call it T-Stops. I really like the included TC, seems like a great option for these exotic zooms. And I say that as a former most serious m4/3 enthusiast who has owned everything from the GF1, to the ridiculous GH1, through various em5's, through EM1 Mk1 and 2. Bottom line, there are so many variables, that, Finding equivalence is redundant. These comments that f4.5 is f4.5 are completely not understanding that it's a RATIO. They all benefited from the larger system that included full frame accessories. Now everyone shoots wedding at 35mm full frame. https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Nikon%20D850,Olympus%20OM-D%20E-M1%20Mark%20II. 2 FILTERS, HOOD, Olympus OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO AUTO-ZOOM 75-150mm f/4 Telephoto Lens from Japan [Exc++], Olympus Digital 40-150mm f3.5-4.5 Zuiko Lens w/ Lens Caps. Views: 17 Reply. Bird Photography with the M.Zuiko 150-400mm PRO | Olympus It’s just so expensive for its (equivalent) specs. olympus 150-400 f4.5 for sale | eBay He's the author of various product guides, educational pieces, product reviews, and interviews with photographers. Even though it’s has the depth of field equivalence of f9 in full-frame speak, it still gives beautiful bokeh that bird and wildlife photographers will love. So the "equivalence" is just for some "if ... then" thinking that is best suited for armchair photography. Go get that new system and spend your time making images and supporting that gear and all of the lenses you are going to purchase. Same shutter. Have You Seen The Cool Things Our Members Get? I bought the mZuiko 100-400 and have been amazed at the results, especially hand-held. You don't get to pick the numbers you like and ignore the other one's. The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-400mm F4.5 TC1.25x IS PRO is a high- resolution, super telephoto zoom lens that is equipped with a built-in 1.25x teleconverter and covers a wide focal length of 300-1000mm equivalent. If the price of the Oly 150-400 is beyond the reach of some users, the PL with a tele range of 200mm to 800mm is very nice to have for a start. You see, if Olympus had done its due diligence, this zoom would never have been produced because those other lens makers sell zoom lenses, also with good bit of reach, for utterly different ILC systems./s, Surprised also, not sarcasm, that no one has commented something like: "Well, just get that big, optically excellent and fast, PanaLeica m4/3 lens and use a tele-converter.". Combined with the OM1’s autofocusing abilities, it will be hard to miss a shot in the right conditions. @Funny Valentine why on earth would you need to go to f14 on the R5? In the video (somewhere around 36:00) you can see a crazy zoom shot of the sun setting behind Mt. I'll never buy this lens or current Olympus camera it is designed for. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Quit worrying about the future of the company unless you are an employee or an investor, and go shoot with what you have. You get similar light gathering on FF at F9 (note that I am talking about a lens-sensor combination, not just lens) vs the m43rds F4.5. Surely you realize your 200-600 gathers LESS light than this at 400mm? Besides "ISO" does not determine light gathering - that is a property of the lens aperture and exposure time. So yes, you are spending $7K on an F9 equivalent lens. Put it this way. This was shot wide open. Is it sensor size that determines how much light I gather or the size of the hole in the lens coupled with the amount of time the shutter remains open? Looking more closely at FOV and depth of field (DOF) equivalence, a full-frame (FF) camera at half the distance to the subject (e.g. Designed for professional and advanced amateur photographers, especially fans of wildlife and sports, the Olympus 150-400mm F4.5 TC1.25x is shaping up to be a seriously impressive lens for serious Micro Four Thirds shooters. EM1 peaks at 9.74. Whatever makes you happy.". But do not assume yours is worthy. This lens combined with the 12-100/4 provides a phenomenal range of possibilities in a 2-lens setup. Everyone who are using 'like' or "Equivalent" is saying exactly that. The f/4.5 maximum aperture of the Olympus means the image it delivers to an M43 sensor wide open is equivalent in shot noise to that delivered by a lens at f/9 (2-stops less light) on a full-frame body. It's here! Want one? These "equivalence" references to compare systems with different sized sensors is a joke! At the same exposure settings, an M43 sensor will capture 1/4 of the total light of a full-frame sensor. In good lighting with exposure preview on (S-OVF turned off), the OM1 and Olympus 150-400mm f4.5 PRO do a terrific job. The fact that it is a point and shoot isn’t such a big issue at all; but the fact that it’s a superzoom camera being marketed as one with a 125x optical zoom is what’s insane. Nobody is attacking your first born. They’re not showing what the lens can do. @MEDISN1) I have the 200-600, I shoot sports with it, no birds. Do yourself a favor and stop following that idiot Tony Northrup. If it is not my money making thing I will shoot things that are more suitable to my nature or that works for me. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. "Yes, and we do all know that Sony isn't any good in it. After all the limitation is per image diagonal, not per pixel or so.Moreover. In full-frame language, this is the equivalent of an f9 lens because of the 2x crop factor.
Eiswasser Experiment Psychologie,
Projektleiter Gehalt Forum,
الرحم مفتوح واحد ونص متى الولادة,
Code Postal Ariana Borj Louzir,
Articles O